investment: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.67
, currency
Weight: 0.62
, purchase
Weight: 0.61
, stock
Weight: 0.61
, advertising
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality use 0.88
has quality worth 0.85
has quality cost 0.82
is good thing 0.78
has quality evil 0.78
has quality asset 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(savings account, is best)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(currency, has quality use)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(savings account, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(currency, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(currency, has quality use)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(savings account, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(advertising, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality cost)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(savings account, is best)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(savings account, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(investment, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(investment, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, has quality asset)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(investment, is good thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(investment, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(investment, has quality asset)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(investment, is good thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(investment, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(currency, has quality use)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality cost)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(savings account, is best)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)