invitation: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gesture
Weight: 0.66
, item
Weight: 0.63
, letter
Weight: 0.60
, offer
Weight: 0.60
Siblings last supper
Weight: 0.58
, summons
Weight: 0.52
, xing
Weight: 0.34
, gift
Weight: 0.33
, handshake
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is ungiven good 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gesture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(invitation, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(offer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(invitation, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(gesture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(invitation, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(offer, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(gesture, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(gesture, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(gesture, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gesture, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(offer, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(handshake, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(handshake, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gesture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(invitation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(offer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(invitation, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(gesture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(invitation, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(handshake, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(handshake, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(handshake, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(handshake, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(invitation, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(invitation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(offer, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(handshake, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(handshake, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(offer, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(invitation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality bad)