io: have better touch response than android

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.56
, platform
Weight: 0.56
, operating system
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, ion
Weight: 0.53
Siblings solaris
Weight: 0.32
, unix
Weight: 0.32
, microsoft
Weight: 0.32
, linux
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have better touch response than android 1.00
be better than android 0.90
look better than android 0.90
feel more responsive than android 0.89
be faster than android 0.88
be than android 0.87
be more efficient than android 0.86
be more fluid than android 0.86
keep up with android 0.84
feel smoother than android 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(io, have better touch response than android)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(io, be than android)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(io, be than android)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(io, be than android)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(io, look better than android)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(io, be more efficient than android)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(io, look better than android)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(io, be more efficient than android)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(io, look better than android)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(io, look better than android)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(io, be more efficient than android)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(io, be more fluid than android)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(io, be more efficient than android)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(io, keep up with android)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(io, be faster than android)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(io, be better than android)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(io, be better than android)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(io, be more fluid than android)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(io, keep up with android)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(io, feel smoother than android)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(io, feel smoother than android)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(io, be faster than android)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(io, be more fluid than android)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(io, feel smoother than android)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(io, keep up with android)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(io, feel smoother than android)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(io, be more fluid than android)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(io, keep up with android)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(io, be faster than android)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(io, be faster than android)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(io, be better than android)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(io, be than android)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(io, be better than android)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(io, have better touch response than android)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(io, have better touch response than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(io, have better touch response than android)