iowa: be first state vote in primaries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be first state vote in primaries 1.00
be important in primaries 0.95
have considered primaries 0.94
have considered important primaries 0.94
be first state vote 0.89
is election state 0.88
hold first two primary elections 0.87
hold two primary elections 0.87
be important in presidential elections 0.87
be important to presidential elections 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in primaries)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, have considered important primaries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, hold first two primary elections)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, have considered important primaries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in primaries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, hold first two primary elections)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, have considered important primaries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, hold first two primary elections)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in primaries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(iowa, have considered important primaries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iowa, hold first two primary elections)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to presidential elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)