iowa: be important in elections

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in elections 1.00
be important to elections 1.00
be important during elections 0.98
be important in presidential elections 0.95
be important to presidential elections 0.95
be important in election 0.95
be important to election 0.94
is important election state 0.93
hold two elections 0.92
be important for elections yahoo 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in elections)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in election)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in elections)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to elections)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to elections)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important during elections)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important during elections)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to elections)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important during elections)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in election)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(iowa, is important election state)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, is important election state)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(iowa, be important for elections yahoo)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important for elections yahoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iowa, is important election state)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important for elections yahoo)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to elections)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important during elections)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important for elections yahoo)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is important election state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in elections)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election)