iowa: be important in presidential polls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in presidential polls 1.00
be important in polls 0.95
be important in presidential elections 0.95
be important to presidential elections 0.95
be important in presidential election 0.94
be important to presidential election 0.94
be important to presidential candidates 0.90
be important to presidential primary 0.89
be important in elections 0.88
be important in presidential campaigns 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to presidential candidates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to presidential primary)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential campaigns)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to presidential candidates)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to presidential primary)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to presidential candidates)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential campaigns)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to presidential primary)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential campaigns)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential campaigns)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to presidential candidates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to presidential primary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections)