iowa: be important in primaries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in primaries 1.00
have considered important primaries 0.98
have considered primaries 0.98
be first state vote in primaries 0.95
be important in presidential elections 0.86
be important to presidential elections 0.86
be important in presidential election 0.85
be important to presidential election 0.85
be important to presidential primary 0.85
be important in presidential polls 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in primaries)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, have considered important primaries)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, have considered important primaries)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, have considered important primaries)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to presidential primary)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential polls)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential polls)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to presidential primary)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be first state vote in primaries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential polls)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to presidential primary)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(iowa, have considered important primaries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential polls)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to presidential elections)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to presidential primary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in primaries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(iowa, be important in primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in primaries)