ip: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents protocol
Weight: 0.59
, technology
Weight: 0.56
, security system
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, option
Weight: 0.53
Siblings ssl
Weight: 0.34
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.32
, ajax
Weight: 0.32
, cpu
Weight: 0.32
, xml
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be important for communication 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(technology, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ip, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(technology, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(technology, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ip, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ip, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(ip, be important for communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ip, be important for communication)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ip, be important for communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ip, be important for communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ip, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ip, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(technology, be important to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ip, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(technology, be important to business)