ipa: be high in calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents beer
Weight: 0.55
, style
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, standard
Weight: 0.43
Siblings guinness
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.31
, ping pong
Weight: 0.31
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in calories 1.00
have calories 0.97
have more calories 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(guinness, have calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(guinness, have calories)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(guinness, have calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(ipa, be high in calories)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ipa, have more calories)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ipa, have calories)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(ipa, have more calories)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ipa, have calories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ipa, have calories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(ipa, have calories)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ipa, have more calories)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ipa, have more calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ipa, be high in calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ipa, be high in calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ipa, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(guinness, have calories)