ipa: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents beer
Weight: 0.55
, style
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, standard
Weight: 0.43
Siblings guinness
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.31
, ping pong
Weight: 0.31
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worth 0.82
taste bad 0.80
go bad 0.79
is terrible 0.77
taste good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(beer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ipa, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ipa, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ipa, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ipa, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ipa, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(beer, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ipa, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(style, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(style, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(standard, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beer, taste bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(beer, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(guinness, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ping pong, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(beer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ipa, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ipa, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ipa, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ipa, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ipa, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(beer, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ipa, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ping pong, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ping pong, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(guinness, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(guinness, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ipa, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ipa, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(ipa, go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ipa, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ipa, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ipa, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ipa, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ipa, has quality worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ipa, taste bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ipa, go bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ipa, has quality worth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ipa, go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ipa, is terrible)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ipa, taste bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ipa, is terrible)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ipa, taste good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality worth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ipa, is terrible)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ipa, taste good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ipa, is terrible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ipa, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beer, taste bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beer, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(guinness, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ping pong, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beer, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beer, taste bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ipa, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)