ipod: be white screen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pda
Weight: 0.68
, invention
Weight: 0.67
, format
Weight: 0.65
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ipad
Weight: 0.66
, iphone
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, dvd
Weight: 0.35
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be white screen 1.00
be black screen 0.98
is touch screen 0.89
is widescreen 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(dvd, is widescreen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(dvd, is widescreen)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dvd, is widescreen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ipod, be white screen)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ipod, is touch screen)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ipod, be black screen)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ipod, is touch screen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ipod, be black screen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ipod, be black screen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(ipod, be black screen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(ipod, is touch screen)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is touch screen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(ipod, be white screen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ipod, be white screen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(ipod, be white screen)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dvd, is widescreen)