ipod: correctly is spelled like ipod ipod

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pda
Weight: 0.68
, invention
Weight: 0.67
, format
Weight: 0.65
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ipad
Weight: 0.66
, iphone
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, dvd
Weight: 0.35
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
correctly is spelled like ipod ipod 1.00
be called ipod 0.94
be called ipods 0.82
use different os than macs 0.77
be pro better than ipad 0.77
be instead of cd 0.77
be plugged in for hey siri 0.77
look bad on hdtv 0.76
asking for apple i d 0.76
come with u2 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dvd, be instead of cd)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dvd, look bad on hdtv)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dvd, be instead of cd)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(dvd, be instead of cd)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(dvd, look bad on hdtv)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dvd, look bad on hdtv)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ipod, be called ipod)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ipod, be called ipod)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ipod, be called ipods)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ipod, be called ipod)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ipod, asking for apple i d)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ipod, be called ipod)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ipod, asking for apple i d)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ipod, be called ipods)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ipod, asking for apple i d)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(ipod, be called ipods)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(ipod, be called ipods)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ipod, asking for apple i d)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(dvd, be instead of cd)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ipod, correctly is spelled like ipod ipod)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(dvd, look bad on hdtv)