ipod: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pda
Weight: 0.68
, invention
Weight: 0.67
, format
Weight: 0.65
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ipad
Weight: 0.66
, iphone
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, dvd
Weight: 0.35
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is damn expensive 0.84
is classic expensive 0.82
be expensive in india 0.77
is x inexpensive 0.77
be more expensive than tablets 0.76
be more expensive in australia 0.76
sell well despite expensive price tag 0.76
be cheaper than xs 0.76
be cheaper on ebay 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dvd, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper on ebay)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be expensive in india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be cheaper than xs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(iphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iphone, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ipad, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ipad, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(dvd, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dvd, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(iphone, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(iphone, be expensive in india)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(iphone, be cheaper than xs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(iphone, be cheaper than xs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper on ebay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper on ebay)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ipod, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ipod, is damn expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ipod, is damn expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ipod, is classic expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ipod, is classic expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ipod, is damn expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ipod, is classic expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is classic expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is damn expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ipod, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper on ebay)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dvd, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ipad, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iphone, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(iphone, be expensive in india)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ipod, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(iphone, be cheaper than xs)