irc: be dead in america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chat room
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, medium
Weight: 0.52
, channel
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
Siblings bittorrent
Weight: 0.33
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, apache
Weight: 0.32
, chat
Weight: 0.32
, cnn
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dead in america 1.00
be dead in north america 0.95
is dead 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chat, is dead)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(chat, is dead)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(chat, is dead)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(irc, be dead in america)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(irc, is dead)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(irc, be dead in north america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(irc, is dead)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(irc, is dead)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(irc, is dead)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(irc, be dead in north america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(irc, be dead in north america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(irc, be dead in north america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(irc, be dead in america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(irc, be dead in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(irc, be dead in america)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(chat, is dead)