iridium: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.60
, metal
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.56
, system
Weight: 0.56
Siblings titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.36
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.36
, zirconium
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.35
, cerium
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
is quality 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iridium, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(alloy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iridium, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(alloy, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(metal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(alloy, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(zirconium, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aluminum oxide, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(iridium, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(alloy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(iridium, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(zirconium, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(zirconium, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(titanium dioxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, is quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(aluminum oxide, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aluminum oxide, is quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(iridium, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(iridium, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(iridium, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(iridium, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(iridium, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iridium, is quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(iridium, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(iridium, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(iridium, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(iridium, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(iridium, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iridium, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(alloy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(zirconium, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminum oxide, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iridium, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(alloy, has quality good)