iron maiden: be considered good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.62
, legend
Weight: 0.60
, act
Weight: 0.59
, artist
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.58
Siblings iron
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.33
, aluminum
Weight: 0.33
, copper
Weight: 0.33
, copper sulfate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered good 1.00
is great 0.77
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(iron maiden, be considered good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(band, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(iron maiden, be considered good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(iron maiden, be considered good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(band, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(copper, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(band, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(copper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(copper, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(aluminum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aluminum, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(iron maiden, be considered good)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iron maiden, is great)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iron maiden, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iron maiden, is great)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iron maiden, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(iron maiden, is great)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(iron maiden, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, is great)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(iron maiden, be considered good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(band, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminum, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(copper, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(band, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(iron maiden, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality good)