isis: be in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goddess
Weight: 0.65
, deity
Weight: 0.62
, company
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.54
, syria
Weight: 0.53
Siblings diana
Weight: 0.33
, baal
Weight: 0.33
, buddha
Weight: 0.33
, god
Weight: 0.32
, apollo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in business 1.00
go out of business 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(isis, be in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(isis, be in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(company, be in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(company, go out of business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(company, go out of business)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, be in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(isis, be in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(isis, be in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(isis, be in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(isis, be in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(isis, be in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(company, be in business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(company, go out of business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(company, be in business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(isis, be in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(company, go out of business)