island: be part of ny

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents site
Weight: 0.65
, port
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.61
, country
Weight: 0.60
Siblings long island
Weight: 0.88
, rhode island
Weight: 0.85
, staten island
Weight: 0.84
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.81
, marshall islands
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be part of ny 1.00
be in nyc 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(staten island, be part of ny)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(staten island, be in nyc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(staten island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(staten island, be part of ny)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(staten island, be in nyc)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(staten island, be in nyc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(island, be part of ny)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(island, be in nyc)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(island, be in nyc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(island, be in nyc)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(island, be in nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(island, be part of ny)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(island, be part of ny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(staten island, be part of ny)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(island, be part of ny)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(staten island, be in nyc)