iso: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents standard
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.58
, cd
Weight: 0.56
, stock option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings xml
Weight: 0.33
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.32
, lcd
Weight: 0.32
, ssl
Weight: 0.32
, mac address
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality better 0.89
has quality bad 0.87
has quality cost 0.86
has quality worth 0.83
has quality difference 0.79
has quality format 0.76
has quality functions 0.75
has quality leverage 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock option, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cd, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(stock option, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(option, has quality leverage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cd, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(standard, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(cd, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(option, has quality leverage)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(function, has quality functions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality leverage)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cd, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cd, is quality)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ssl, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(xml, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(xml, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lcd, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cd, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(iso, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock option, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(iso, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(iso, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(iso, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(iso, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(stock option, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(iso, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(iso, is quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(iso, is quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(option, has quality leverage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(iso, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lcd, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(lcd, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lcd, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(lcd, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(xml, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(xml, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ssl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ssl, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(xml, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(xml, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(iso, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(iso, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(iso, has quality worth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(iso, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(iso, has quality worth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(iso, has quality worth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(iso, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(option, has quality leverage)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cd, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(function, has quality functions)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cd, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(lcd, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lcd, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ssl, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(xml, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cd, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cd, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(option, has quality leverage)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(iso, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(function, has quality functions)