isolation: be important for food production

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings loneliness
Weight: 0.34
, alienation
Weight: 0.33
, boredom
Weight: 0.33
, stigma
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for food production 1.00
have focusing on sources production 0.78
have focusing on renewable sources production 0.77
be in food preparation 0.77
be important for plant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, have focusing on renewable sources production)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(isolation, be important for food production)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(method, have focusing on sources production)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(isolation, be important for food production)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(problem, be in food preparation)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(isolation, be important for food production)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(problem, be in food preparation)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(method, have focusing on sources production)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(method, have focusing on renewable sources production)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(method, have focusing on sources production)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in food preparation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, have focusing on renewable sources production)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(stigma, be important for plant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(method, have focusing on sources production)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(isolation, be important for food production)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, have focusing on renewable sources production)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(isolation, be important for food production)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(problem, be in food preparation)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(isolation, be important for food production)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(stigma, be important for plant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(stigma, be important for plant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(isolation, be important for food production)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(isolation, be important for food production)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(method, have focusing on sources production)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(problem, be in food preparation)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, have focusing on renewable sources production)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stigma, be important for plant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(method, have focusing on sources production)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(problem, be in food preparation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(isolation, be important for food production)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, have focusing on renewable sources production)