isolation: cause species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings loneliness
Weight: 0.34
, alienation
Weight: 0.33
, boredom
Weight: 0.33
, stigma
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
cause species 1.00
increase number of species 0.84
lead to changes in animal species 0.84
lead to evolutionary changes in animal species 0.83
increase number of endemic species 0.82
cause 0.79
be for aquatic ecosystems 0.78
be for ecosystems 0.78
be important for speciation 0.76
relate to speciation 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(loneliness, cause)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(loneliness, cause)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(loneliness, cause)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(isolation, cause species)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, increase number of species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, increase number of species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number of species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(isolation, cause species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(isolation, cause species)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(isolation, cause species)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(loneliness, cause)