isolation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings loneliness
Weight: 0.34
, alienation
Weight: 0.33
, boredom
Weight: 0.33
, stigma
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for country 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
seen as bad thing 0.76
feel good 0.76
be good for us 0.75
is good thing 0.75
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(isolation, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(isolation, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(loneliness, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(loneliness, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alienation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(boredom, be good for us)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(loneliness, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(boredom, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alienation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(alienation, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boredom, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boredom, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(loneliness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(loneliness, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(boredom, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boredom, be good for us)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(loneliness, feel good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(loneliness, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(boredom, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(boredom, is good thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(boredom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(boredom, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(loneliness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(loneliness, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(isolation, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(isolation, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(isolation, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(isolation, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(isolation, be bad for country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, be bad for country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be bad for country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(isolation, is good thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(isolation, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, is good thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(isolation, is good thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(isolation, be bad for country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(isolation, is good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(isolation, feel good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(isolation, is bad thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(isolation, is bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(isolation, is bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(isolation, seen as bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(isolation, seen as bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(isolation, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(isolation, seen as bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(isolation, seen as bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(isolation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(alienation, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(boredom, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(loneliness, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(boredom, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(loneliness, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(loneliness, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(boredom, be good for us)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(boredom, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(isolation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)