isolation: has state problem

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.64 , problem Weight: 0.62 , method Weight: 0.60 , characteristic Weight: 0.60
Siblings	loneliness Weight: 0.34 , alienation Weight: 0.33 , boredom Weight: 0.33 , stigma Weight: 0.33 , mental health problem Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state problem	1.00
be different from problems	0.82
be research problem	0.82
be most problematic state of being	0.79
has state equation	0.77
be problem for teens	0.76
has state dislike	0.76
was problem in asia	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(isolation, has state problem)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(characteristic, has state equation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(isolation, has state problem)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(factor, has state dislike) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(isolation, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(factor, has state dislike)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(characteristic, has state equation)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(factor, has state dislike)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has state equation)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(loneliness, be problem for teens)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(boredom, be most problematic state of being)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(isolation, has state problem)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(characteristic, has state equation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(isolation, has state problem)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(factor, has state dislike) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(isolation, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(boredom, has state problem)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(boredom, be most problematic state of being) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(boredom, be most problematic state of being)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(loneliness, be problem for teens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(loneliness, be problem for teens)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(isolation, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(isolation, was problem in asia)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(isolation, was problem in asia)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(isolation, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(characteristic, has state equation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(boredom, has state problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(boredom, be most problematic state of being)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(loneliness, be problem for teens)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(isolation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(characteristic, has state equation)