isolation: increase number of endemic species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings loneliness
Weight: 0.34
, alienation
Weight: 0.33
, boredom
Weight: 0.33
, stigma
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase number of endemic species 1.00
increase number of species 0.92
cause species 0.82
lead to changes in animal species 0.79
increase number 0.79
lead to evolutionary changes in animal species 0.78
is epidemic 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(loneliness, is epidemic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(loneliness, is epidemic)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(loneliness, is epidemic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(isolation, increase number of endemic species)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, increase number of species)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, increase number of species)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number of species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(isolation, increase number)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(isolation, increase number)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(isolation, cause species)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(isolation, cause species)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(isolation, cause species)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(isolation, cause species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of endemic species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number of endemic species)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(loneliness, is epidemic)