isolation: increase number of species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings loneliness
Weight: 0.34
, alienation
Weight: 0.33
, boredom
Weight: 0.33
, stigma
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase number of species 1.00
increase number of endemic species 0.92
increase number 0.87
cause species 0.84
lead to changes in animal species 0.83
lead to evolutionary changes in animal species 0.82
be on increase 0.80
be related to number 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number of species)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to number)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to number)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mental health problem, be on increase)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, increase number of species)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(mental health problem, be on increase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(mental health problem, be on increase)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, increase number of species)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(isolation, increase number)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(isolation, increase number)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number of endemic species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(isolation, cause species)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(isolation, cause species)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(isolation, cause species)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(isolation, cause species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, increase number of species)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mental health problem, be on increase)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, increase number of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)