isolation: lead to evolutionary changes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings loneliness
Weight: 0.34
, alienation
Weight: 0.33
, boredom
Weight: 0.33
, stigma
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
lead to evolutionary changes 1.00
lead to evolutionary changes in animal species 0.93
lead to changes 0.86
lead to changes in animal species 0.83
be important in evolution 0.81
cause changes 0.78
be important for speciation 0.77
be involved in speciation 0.76
required for speciation 0.76
relate to speciation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(factor, cause changes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(factor, cause changes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(factor, cause changes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(factor, cause changes)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to changes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to changes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to changes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, be important in evolution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, be important in evolution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important in evolution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, be involved in speciation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(isolation, be involved in speciation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be involved in speciation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to changes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to changes in animal species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(isolation, be important in evolution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(isolation, be involved in speciation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(isolation, required for speciation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(isolation, required for speciation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(isolation, required for speciation)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(isolation, required for speciation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(factor, cause changes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(factor, cause changes)