isolation: was problem in asia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings loneliness
Weight: 0.34
, alienation
Weight: 0.33
, boredom
Weight: 0.33
, stigma
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was problem in asia 1.00
many rivers in asia 0.83
be in south africa 0.77
be in egypt affect america 0.76
be in africa 0.76
be with north korea 0.75
has state problem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(problem, many rivers in asia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(isolation, was problem in asia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(isolation, was problem in asia)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be with north korea)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(isolation, was problem in asia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(problem, be with north korea)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(problem, many rivers in asia)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(problem, many rivers in asia)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with north korea)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(problem, many rivers in asia)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be with north korea)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boredom, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(boredom, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(isolation, was problem in asia)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(isolation, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(isolation, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(isolation, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(isolation, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(isolation, was problem in asia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(problem, be with north korea)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(problem, many rivers in asia)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boredom, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(problem, be with north korea)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(problem, many rivers in asia)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(isolation, was problem in asia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, be in egypt affect america)