italian restaurant: be at chicago

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, pub
Weight: 0.64
, shop
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.61
, store
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pizzeria
Weight: 0.60
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at chicago 1.00
be at nyc 0.83
be at michigan 0.82
be at london 0.79
be at florida 0.78
be at manhattan 0.78
be at montreal 0.78
be at tulsa 0.78
be at texas 0.77
be at california 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pub, be at london)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(store, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(store, be at texas)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pub, be at london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pub, be at london)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(store, be at texas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pub, be at london)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(store, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at texas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pub, be at london)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(store, be at texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at chicago)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pub, be at london)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(store, be at texas)