italian restaurant: be at new york

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, pub
Weight: 0.64
, shop
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.61
, store
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pizzeria
Weight: 0.60
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new york 1.00
be at new york city 0.97
be at nyc 0.79
be at london 0.77
be at chicago 0.75
be at manhattan 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pub, be at london)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pub, be at london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pub, be at london)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pub, be at london)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at chicago)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be at new york)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pub, be at london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at chicago)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pub, be at london)