italian restaurant: be at new york city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, pub
Weight: 0.64
, shop
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.61
, store
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pizzeria
Weight: 0.60
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new york city 1.00
be at new york 0.97
be at nyc 0.79
be at manhattan 0.76
be at london 0.76
be at english town or city 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pub, be at london)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pub, be at english town or city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(pub, be at english town or city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pub, be at london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pub, be at london)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pub, be at english town or city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pub, be at london)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(pub, be at english town or city)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be at new york city)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pub, be at london)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pub, be at english town or city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at new york)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pub, be at london)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pub, be at english town or city)