italian restaurant: has pasta dish on menu

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, pub
Weight: 0.64
, shop
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.61
, store
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pizzeria
Weight: 0.60
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
has pasta dish on menu 1.00
be used to eat pasta 0.91
has menu 0.90
be used to enjoy pasta 0.89
has paper menu 0.88
be used to eat lasagna 0.86
be used to eat polenta 0.85
be used to eat fajitas 0.85
be used to cook fresh pizza 0.84
be used to eat tasty food 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(restaurant, has paper menu)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has paper menu)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has menu)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has paper menu)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has menu)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be used to cook fresh pizza)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(restaurant, has paper menu)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pizzeria, be used to cook fresh pizza)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be used to cook fresh pizza)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(restaurant, has menu)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(restaurant, has paper menu)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be used to cook fresh pizza)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(restaurant, has menu)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(restaurant, has paper menu)