jack: be in box mechanisums

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents player
Weight: 0.63
, boy
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, hit
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.59
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.33
, baseball player
Weight: 0.32
, monkey wrench
Weight: 0.32
, joker
Weight: 0.32
, samsung
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in box mechanisums 1.00
be in box 1.00
be in box called in box 0.99
be in box called 0.98
be in box good 0.96
be in box different 0.96
be in box expensive 0.94
be in box anyway 0.93
be in box works 0.91
be in box slow 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(jack, be in box mechanisums)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(jack, be in box)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(jack, be in box)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(jack, be in box anyway)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(jack, be in box)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(jack, be in box anyway)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(jack, be in box anyway)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(jack, be in box anyway)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(jack, be in box)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(jack, be in box mechanisums)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(jack, be in box mechanisums)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(jack, be in box mechanisums)