jackal: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, scavenger
Weight: 0.60
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, beast
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, fox
Weight: 0.36
, hyena
Weight: 0.36
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
have bad reputation 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(beast, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(jackal, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(beast, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beast, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hyena, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hyena, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(beast, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(jackal, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hyena, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hyena, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mountain goat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mountain goat, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hyena, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(hyena, have bad reputation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(jackal, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(jackal, have bad reputation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(jackal, have bad reputation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(jackal, have bad reputation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(jackal, have bad reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(jackal, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beast, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hyena, have bad reputation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hyena, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mountain goat, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(jackal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beast, has quality bad)