jake: be related with mr westing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.56
, friend
Weight: 0.55
, band
Weight: 0.55
, kid
Weight: 0.53
, show
Weight: 0.52
Siblings tom
Weight: 0.34
, jesse james
Weight: 0.34
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.34
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related with mr westing 1.00
have paul 0.79
is paul 0.79
have rich paul 0.77
be with vanessa 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(jake, be related with mr westing)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(jake, is paul)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(jake, is paul)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(jake, is paul)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(jake, be with vanessa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(jake, be with vanessa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(jake, be with vanessa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(jake, be with vanessa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(jake, have rich paul)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jake, have rich paul)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(jake, is paul)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(jake, have rich paul)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(jake, have rich paul)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(jake, be related with mr westing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(jake, be related with mr westing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jake, be related with mr westing)