japanese restaurant: be at japan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.72
, bar
Weight: 0.64
, japan
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, everything
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at japan 1.00
be at india 0.79
be at san diego 0.78
be at mexico 0.78
be used to eat japanese food 0.78
be at california 0.78
be used to buy and eat japanese food 0.77
be at seattle 0.76
be used to order chinese food 0.75
be at texas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to order chinese food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to order chinese food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to order chinese food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at texas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to buy and eat japanese food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat japanese food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to eat japanese food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to buy and eat japanese food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to buy and eat japanese food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to eat japanese food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat japanese food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to buy and eat japanese food)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at japan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to order chinese food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at india)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at japan)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at seattle)