japanese restaurant: be at major city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.72
, bar
Weight: 0.64
, japan
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, everything
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at major city 1.00
be at big city 0.90
be at any large city 0.86
be at large city 0.85
be at city 0.84
be at most city in world 0.83
be at many city 0.83
be at any big north american city 0.81
be at large town 0.78
be at downtown area 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bar, be at city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bar, be at city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at big city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at any large city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at downtown area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bar, be at city)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at downtown area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be at major city)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be at large city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bar, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bar, be at city)