java: be better than c programming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coffee
Weight: 0.72
, software
Weight: 0.59
, programming language
Weight: 0.58
, island
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.57
Siblings groovy
Weight: 0.50
, tcl
Weight: 0.46
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.37
, mocha
Weight: 0.36
, coffee maker
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than c programming 1.00
be better than other programming language 0.86
be better than programming languages 0.84
be used in programming 0.84
be better than other programming languages 0.84
is good programming language 0.82
is best programming language 0.81
is important programming language 0.80
is programming language 0.80
be different from programming languages 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(java, be better than c programming)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(java, is programming language)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(java, be used in programming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than other programming language)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(java, be used in programming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(java, is best programming language)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(java, is good programming language)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(java, is programming language)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(java, is important programming language)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(java, be used in programming)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(java, be used in programming)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(java, is programming language)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(java, be better than other programming language)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(java, is programming language)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(java, is good programming language)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(java, be better than other programming language)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(java, is good programming language)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(java, be better than other programming language)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(java, is good programming language)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(java, is best programming language)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(java, is important programming language)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(java, is important programming language)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(java, is best programming language)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(java, is important programming language)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(java, is best programming language)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than c programming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be better than c programming)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(java, be better than c programming)