jaw: was bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents muscle
Weight: 0.63
, tooth
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.59
, film
Weight: 0.58
, movie
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wisdom tooth
Weight: 0.57
, nose
Weight: 0.35
, forearm
Weight: 0.35
, bone
Weight: 0.35
, skull
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.85
was important in 1970s 0.79
is scary 0.76
has quality good 0.76
was made 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jaw, was bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(movie, is scary)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jaw, was bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jaw, was bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jaw, was bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jaw, was bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(film, was made)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jaw, was bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(film, was made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(movie, is scary)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tooth, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(movie, is scary)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(film, was made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(skull, is scary)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(forearm, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(movie, is scary)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(jaw, was bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(jaw, was bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(jaw, was bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(jaw, was bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(jaw, was bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(film, was made)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(jaw, was bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(forearm, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(forearm, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(skull, is scary)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(skull, is scary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(jaw, was bad)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(jaw, was made)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(jaw, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(jaw, is scary)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(jaw, was made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jaw, was important in 1970s)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(jaw, is scary)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(jaw, is scary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was important in 1970s)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(jaw, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(jaw, was made)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(jaw, was important in 1970s)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(jaw, is scary)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(jaw, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was made)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(jaw, was important in 1970s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jaw, was bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(film, was made)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tooth, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(movie, is scary)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(forearm, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(skull, is scary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(film, was made)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tooth, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(movie, is scary)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jaw, was bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)