jay: play in montreal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.55
, movie
Weight: 0.53
, film
Weight: 0.52
Siblings blue jay
Weight: 0.38
, american robin
Weight: 0.36
, robin
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
play in montreal 1.00
be in back canada 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, play in montreal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(blue jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(blue jay, play in montreal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(jay, play in montreal)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(jay, be in back canada)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(jay, be in back canada)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(jay, be in back canada)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(jay, be in back canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(jay, play in montreal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(jay, play in montreal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(blue jay, play in montreal)