jazz: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.66
, song
Weight: 0.64
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, format
Weight: 0.58
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.38
, jazz music
Weight: 0.38
, pop music
Weight: 0.37
, rock music
Weight: 0.37
, country music
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is bad now 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad now)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(jazz music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(country music, is bad now)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(jazz music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(jazz music, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(pop music, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad now)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(jazz music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(jazz music, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(country music, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(country music, is bad now)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(jazz, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(jazz, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(jazz music, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(country music, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad now)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(jazz music, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(country music, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(country music, is bad now)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)