jeans: be called pair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.64
, product
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, attire
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shirt
Weight: 0.60
, dress
Weight: 0.37
, blouse
Weight: 0.36
, underwear
Weight: 0.35
, denim
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called pair 1.00
is pair 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(underwear, be called pair)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(underwear, is pair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(underwear, is pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(underwear, is pair)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(underwear, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(underwear, be called pair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(jeans, be called pair)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(jeans, is pair)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(jeans, is pair)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(jeans, is pair)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(jeans, is pair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(jeans, be called pair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(jeans, be called pair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(underwear, is pair)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(jeans, be called pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(underwear, be called pair)