jeff: was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guy
Weight: 0.57
, friend
Weight: 0.56
, man
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.55
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.35
, john smith
Weight: 0.35
, henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.35
, michael
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran 1.00
was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran away 0.99
was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier ran 0.99
was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier ran away 0.98
was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier 0.98
was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier 0.97
was sympathetic to soldier ran 0.97
was sympathetic to soldier ran away 0.95
was sympathetic to soldier 0.95
was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran by kay boyle 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran away)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier ran)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier ran away)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier ran)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier ran away)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran away)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier ran)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran away)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier ran away)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier ran)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran by kay boyle)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier ran away)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier ran)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier ran)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier ran away)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier ran away)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran by kay boyle)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran by kay boyle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran away)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier ran away)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier ran)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier ran away)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in short story soldier)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran by kay boyle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier ran)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jeff, was sympathetic to soldier in story soldier ran)