jersey: be better than pennsylvania

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.59
, merchandise
Weight: 0.54
, uniform
Weight: 0.54
Siblings sweatshirt
Weight: 0.34
, t shirt
Weight: 0.34
, shirt
Weight: 0.34
, helmet
Weight: 0.33
, sweater
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than pennsylvania 1.00
be better than new york 0.81
have higher population than alaska 0.77
be cheaper than new york 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(jersey, have higher population than alaska)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jersey, be better than new york)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(jersey, be cheaper than new york)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(jersey, be better than new york)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(jersey, have higher population than alaska)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(jersey, be better than new york)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(jersey, be better than new york)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(jersey, be cheaper than new york)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(jersey, have higher population than alaska)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(jersey, have higher population than alaska)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(jersey, be cheaper than new york)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jersey, be cheaper than new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jersey, be better than pennsylvania)