jewelry: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wedding
Weight: 0.62
, earring
Weight: 0.61
, wrist watch
Weight: 0.60
, wristwatch
Weight: 0.53
, fob
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality change 0.86
has quality worth 0.85
be good for earth 0.75
be better for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(jewelry, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vehicle, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(jewelry, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(vehicle, be good for earth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, be good for earth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fob, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(earring, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vehicle, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fob, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fob, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(earring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(earring, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(jewelry, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(jewelry, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(jewelry, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(jewelry, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(jewelry, has quality change)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(jewelry, has quality worth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(jewelry, has quality change)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(jewelry, has quality worth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(jewelry, has quality change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(jewelry, has quality worth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(jewelry, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(vehicle, be good for earth)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fob, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(earring, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(jewelry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(vehicle, be good for earth)