jewelry: was important to egyptians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wedding
Weight: 0.62
, earring
Weight: 0.61
, wrist watch
Weight: 0.60
, wristwatch
Weight: 0.53
, fob
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to egyptians 1.00
be important to egyptian 0.82
was made in ancient egypt 0.80
was made in egypt 0.79
be important to ancient egyptian 0.79
be important in india 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(jewelry, was important to egyptians)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, was made in ancient egypt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(jewelry, was made in ancient egypt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, was made in egypt)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(jewelry, was made in egypt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(jewelry, be important to egyptian)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(jewelry, be important to ancient egyptian)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be important to ancient egyptian)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be important in india)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be important to egyptian)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(jewelry, be important in india)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(jewelry, was made in ancient egypt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(jewelry, be important to egyptian)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(jewelry, was made in egypt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(jewelry, be important to egyptian)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(jewelry, be important to ancient egyptian)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(jewelry, be important to ancient egyptian)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(jewelry, be important in india)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jewelry, was made in ancient egypt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(jewelry, was made in egypt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(jewelry, be important in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, was important to egyptians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jewelry, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(jewelry, was important to egyptians)