jitter: be vs latency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.67
, noise
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.52
Siblings voltage
Weight: 0.35
, amplitude
Weight: 0.35
, frequency
Weight: 0.34
, throughput
Weight: 0.34
, attenuation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs latency 1.00
be same as latency 0.94
has state latency 0.93
is latency test 0.92
be vs ping 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(jitter, be vs latency)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(jitter, is latency test)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(jitter, is latency test)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(jitter, be same as latency)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(jitter, be same as latency)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(jitter, be same as latency)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(jitter, has state latency)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(jitter, is latency test)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(jitter, be vs ping)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(jitter, be vs ping)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(jitter, be vs ping)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(jitter, be vs ping)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(jitter, is latency test)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(jitter, be same as latency)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(jitter, has state latency)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(jitter, has state latency)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(jitter, has state latency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(jitter, be vs latency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(jitter, be vs latency)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(jitter, be vs latency)