job: be in fashion design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents assignment
Weight: 0.60
, challenge
Weight: 0.60
, crisis
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings auto mechanic
Weight: 0.67
, peace corps
Weight: 0.65
, firefighter
Weight: 0.65
, janitor
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in fashion design 1.00
is design 0.90
be in video game design 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(job, be in fashion design)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(job, be in video game design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(job, be in video game design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(job, be in video game design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(job, be in video game design)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(job, is design)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(job, is design)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(job, is design)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(job, is design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(job, be in fashion design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(job, be in fashion design)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(job, be in fashion design)