jock: is stereotypical nerds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stereotype
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, clique
Weight: 0.49
, person
Weight: 0.48
, other people
Weight: 0.46
Siblings nerd
Weight: 0.33
, guy
Weight: 0.32
, cheerleader
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is stereotypical nerds 1.00
is nerds 0.90
is jocks 0.78
be called jocks 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(nerd, is nerds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(nerd, is nerds)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nerd, is nerds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(jock, is stereotypical nerds)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(jock, is nerds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(jock, is jocks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(jock, is nerds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(jock, is nerds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(jock, be called jocks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(jock, be called jocks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(jock, is jocks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(jock, is jocks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(jock, is nerds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(jock, be called jocks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(jock, is jocks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(jock, be called jocks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(jock, is stereotypical nerds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nerd, is nerds)