jockey: wear white pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.50
, brand
Weight: 0.50
, horseman
Weight: 0.49
Siblings boxer
Weight: 0.33
, sprinter
Weight: 0.33
, wrestler
Weight: 0.33
, cyclist
Weight: 0.33
, tennis player
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear white pants 1.00
wear pants 0.98
wear tights 0.89
wear colours 0.87
wear black armbands 0.84
wear vests 0.82
wear colors 0.82
wear goggles 0.82
wear many goggles 0.81
wear different colours 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(athlete, wear tights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(jockey, wear white pants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(athlete, wear tights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear tights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(athlete, wear tights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(jockey, wear white pants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(jockey, wear white pants)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jockey, wear vests)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(jockey, wear goggles)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(jockey, wear goggles)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(jockey, wear vests)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(jockey, wear different colours)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(jockey, wear goggles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(jockey, wear different colours)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(jockey, wear vests)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(jockey, wear different colours)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jockey, wear goggles)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(jockey, wear vests)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(jockey, wear different colours)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(jockey, wear white pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(jockey, wear white pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(athlete, wear tights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(jockey, wear white pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(athlete, wear tights)