john deere: be better than new holland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lawn mower
Weight: 0.62
, corporation
Weight: 0.59
, customer
Weight: 0.58
, client
Weight: 0.58
, name
Weight: 0.57
Siblings john maynard keynes
Weight: 0.36
, john irving
Weight: 0.36
, john von neumann
Weight: 0.34
, charles darwin
Weight: 0.34
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than new holland 1.00
be better than holland 0.98
be better than case 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(john deere, be better than new holland)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(john deere, be better than holland)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(john deere, be better than holland)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(john deere, be better than holland)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(john deere, be better than holland)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(john deere, be better than case)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(john deere, be better than case)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(john deere, be better than case)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(john deere, be better than case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(john deere, be better than new holland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(john deere, be better than new holland)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(john deere, be better than new holland)